Exhibit - Attach to Pleading/Doc - Exhibit F part 1 to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration March 19, 2018 (2024)

Exhibit - Attach to Pleading/Doc - Exhibit F part 1 to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration March 19, 2018 (1)

Exhibit - Attach to Pleading/Doc - Exhibit F part 1 to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration March 19, 2018 (2)

  • Exhibit - Attach to Pleading/Doc - Exhibit F part 1 to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration March 19, 2018 (3)
  • Exhibit - Attach to Pleading/Doc - Exhibit F part 1 to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration March 19, 2018 (4)
  • Exhibit - Attach to Pleading/Doc - Exhibit F part 1 to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration March 19, 2018 (5)
  • Exhibit - Attach to Pleading/Doc - Exhibit F part 1 to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration March 19, 2018 (6)
  • Exhibit - Attach to Pleading/Doc - Exhibit F part 1 to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration March 19, 2018 (7)
  • Exhibit - Attach to Pleading/Doc - Exhibit F part 1 to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration March 19, 2018 (8)
  • Exhibit - Attach to Pleading/Doc - Exhibit F part 1 to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration March 19, 2018 (9)
  • Exhibit - Attach to Pleading/Doc - Exhibit F part 1 to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration March 19, 2018 (10)
 

Preview

DATE FILED: March 19, 2018 5:31 PM FILING ID: 942FB109917CC CASE NUMBER: 2017CV30697 EXHIBIT F-1 toMOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Andrew D. Lee vs. Gregory D. WelkVideo Deposition of Andrew David Lee December 18, 2017Andrew D. Lee vs. Video Deposition of Andrew David LeeGregory D. Welk December 18, 2017 Page 3·1· ·DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF DENVER ·1· · · · · · · · · · ·P R O C E E D I N G S· · ·STATE OF COLORADO·2 ·2· · · · · · · · · THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· We are on the record at· · ·Court Address: ·3· ·10:19 on December 18th, 2017, at 1720 South Bellaire·3· ·1437 Bannock Street, Room 256 ·4· ·Street, Denver, Colorado.· We're here for the video· · ·Denver, CO 80202· · · · · · · · ·^ COURT USE ONLY ^·4· ·_________________________________________________________ ·5· ·deposition of Andrew D. Lee in the matter of Andrew D.·5· ·ANDREW D. LEE,· · · · · · · · · ·Case No. 17CV30697 ·6· ·Lee vs. Gregory D. Welk in the District Court for Denver·6· · · · Plaintiff,·7· ·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · Div:· 424 ·7· ·County, Colorado, Case Number 2017CV30697.·8· ·GREGORY D. WELK, ·8· · · · · · · · · The videographer is Davis Baumunk.· The·9· · · · Defendant. ·9· ·court reporter is Jessica Benson with Stevens-Koenig10· ·_________________________________________________________11· · · · · · ·VIDEO DEPOSITION OF ANDREW DAVID LEE 10· ·Reporting.12· · · · · · · · · · · ·December 18, 2017 11· · · · · · · · · Will counsel please state their13· ·_________________________________________________________14· ·APPEARANCES: 12· ·appearances starting with the plaintiff's counsel.15· ·ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF: 13· · · · · · · · · MR. GLASER:· Michael L. Glaser for Andrew· · · · · · · ·MICHAEL L. GLASER, ESQ. 14· ·D. Lee.16· · · · · · ·Law Offices of Michael L. Glaser, L.L.C.· · · · · · · ·1720 South Bellaire Street, Suite 607 15· · · · · · · · · MR. KENNEDY:· Brian Kennedy on behalf of17· · · · · · ·Denver, Colorado 80222 16· ·Gregory Welk.· And with me is Dean Batchelder also· · · · · · · ·Phone:· 303-757-160018· · · · · · ·Email:· mglaser@glaserlegal.com 17· ·representing Mr. Welk.19· ·ON BEHALF OF THE DEFENDANT: 18· · · · · · · · · THE VIDEOGRAPHER:· Will the reporter· · · · · · · ·BRIAN D. KENNEDY, ESQ. 19· ·please swear in the witness.20· · · · · · ·Patterson & Salg, P.C.· · · · · · · ·5613 DTC Parkway, Suite 400 20· · · · · · · · · · · ·ANDREW DAVID LEE,21· · · · · · ·Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111 21· ·having been first duly sworn, was examined and· · · · · · · ·Phone:· 303-741-453922· · · · · · ·Email:· bkennedy@pattersonsalg.com 22· ·testified as follows:23· ·ALSO PRESENT: 23· · · · · · · · · MR. GLASER:· Before we begin the· · · · · · · ·D. Dean Batchelder, Esq. 24· ·deposition, Mr. Kennedy, I wanted to put on the record24· · · · · · ·Davis Baumunk, Videographer25 25· ·our agreement, that -- to continue Mr. Lee's deposition Page 2 Page 4·1· · · · · · ·PURSUANT TO WRITTEN NOTICE and the appropriate ·1· ·when and if we receive his military records.· We have·2· ·Rules of Civil Procedure, the video deposition of ANDREW ·2· ·made several requests for them, including a written·3· ·DAVID LEE, called for examination by the Defendant, was ·3· ·request; but the Air Force has not yet responded.· You·4· ·taken at the Law Offices of Michael L. Glaser, L.L.C., ·4· ·and I agree that when those records become available, we·5· ·1720 South Bellaire Street, Suite 607, Denver, Colorado, ·5· ·will make Mr. Lee available again for deposition to ask·6· ·commencing at 10:19 a.m. on December 18, 2017, before ·6· ·questions limited to those records.·7· ·Jessica R. Benson, a Notary Public in and for the State ·7· · · · · · · · · MR. KENNEDY:· I would agree with that.·8· ·of Colorado and Certified Shorthand Reporter in and for ·8· ·Questions limited to the records and, I think, things·9· ·the State of Texas. ·9· ·that logically would flow from the records but not to10· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·I N D E X 10· ·reopen the deposition just generally.11· ·EXAMINATION:· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · PAGE 11· · · · · · · · · MR. GLASER:· Yeah.· Right.· And then the12· ·By Mr. Kennedy· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 5, 273 12· ·other point I want to make is that you do have seven13· ·By Mr. Glaser· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 269 13· ·hours to take Mr. Lee's deposition.· If you spend seven14 14· ·hours today, you won't get another two hours.· I think we15· ·EXHIBITS:· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·PAGE 15· ·understand -- I think both of us -- that you would say --16· ·1· · · · ·Air Force Appeal· · · · · · · · · · · · ·132 16· ·reserve whatever time you need for the records --17· ·2· · · · ·Letter from Colonel Hoffman· · · · · · · 145 17· ·military records to take the examination of Mr. Lee when18· ·3· · · · ·DOD 6130.03· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · 156 18· ·they come available and not use any more time than five19· ·4· · · · ·Google Maps Photographs· · · · · · · · · 207 19· ·hours or whatever you think is necessary --20 20· · · · · · · · · MR. KENNEDY:· I would --21 21· · · · · · · · · MR. GLASER:· -- to complete today.22 22· · · · · · · · · MR. KENNEDY:· I would agree that as a23 23· ·general presumption, seven hours is the presumed limit24 24· ·unless we were to obtain more time from the court.· I can25 25· ·tell you that in practical terms, I do not intend to go Stevens-Koenig Reporting · 303-988-8470· www.SKReporting.com YVer1fAndrew D. Lee vs. Video Deposition of Andrew David LeeGregory D. Welk December 18, 2017 Page 17 Page 19·1· ·honors or just graduate with your class? ·1· · · · · · ·Q.· ·When you applied to Embry-Riddle, I take·2· · · · · · ·A.· ·I can't say technically it was honors. I ·2· ·it you would have had to submit some type of a test·3· ·was above the 3.0 threshold, if you will.· So -- but it ·3· ·score?·4· ·wasn't any label, if you will. ·4· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.·5· · · · · · ·Q.· ·After you completed the bachelor of arts ·5· · · · · · ·Q.· ·What type of test did you have to take?·6· ·degree, did you plan to attend any further formal ·6· · · · · · ·A.· ·At that point it would have been a·7· ·education? ·7· ·transfer from bachelor's to bachelor's.· So it would have·8· · · · · · ·A.· ·It was in the back of my mind but I wanted ·8· ·been SAT, my GPA, and -- what would you call it -- excuse·9· ·to join the Air Force and I wanted to fly.· That had been ·9· ·me -- school records from freshman to that time of10· ·a hankering of mine since I was approximately 12 years 10· ·application.11· ·old; and the degree and the GPA of the degree was, you 11· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Many times when you apply for a12· ·know, sort of the check boxes within that whole package 12· ·graduate-type program, you have to take a test for13· ·of becoming an Air Force pilot. 13· ·admission to a graduate-type program; and there are many14· · · · · · ·Q.· ·So when you say that it was in the back of 14· ·of those, MCATs, LSATs.· You've probably heard of a15· ·your mind, what type of additional education, aside from 15· ·number of them?16· ·what you might pursue in the Air Force, was in the back 16· · · · · · ·A.· ·Uh-huh.17· ·of your mind when you graduated in New Hampshire? 17· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Have you taken any of the tests for18· · · · · · ·A.· ·So I potentially was just going to go for 18· ·admission to a graduate level program?19· ·a master's.· Although, I wanted to go and get my private 19· · · · · · ·A.· ·No, sir.20· ·pilot's license which I did. 20· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· So the -- the last test that you21· · · · · · ·Q.· ·A master's in what? 21· ·would have taken from the standpoint of getting into22· · · · · · ·A.· ·I was going to either go back for 22· ·colleges would have been SAT or ACT?23· ·international relations or something along the lines of 23· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.· Divorced from the -- the Air Force.24· ·intel.· I thought about piloting; but at a master's 24· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Okay.25· ·level, you don't become a pilot.· So -- 25· · · · · · ·A.· ·But that's not college, like you said. Page 18 Page 20·1· · · · · · ·Q.· ·When you say "at a master's level, you ·1· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And in the Air Force you also took some·2· ·don't become a pilot," what is it -- what do you mean? ·2· ·standardized tests; is that correct?·3· · · · · · ·A.· ·If you went to, let's say, Embry-Riddle ·3· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.·4· ·or -- I know MSU here has a program as well.· To become ·4· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Did you take the ASVAB in the Air·5· ·an actual pilot and go through pilot bachelor's -- or ·5· ·Force?·6· ·education, if you will, you have -- it's just at the ·6· · · · · · ·A.· ·I initially enlisted.· So, yes, I took the·7· ·bachelor's level.· There's no master's after that that ·7· ·ASVAB.·8· ·would give you the pilot status. ·8· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Did you take other standard tests·9· · · · · · ·Q.· ·So I want to make sure I understand this ·9· ·as part of your Air Force enlistment or part of your10· ·correctly.· If you were to pursue a -- a formal education 10· ·application to officer training?11· ·as a pilot through a university, the program -- the 11· · · · · · ·A.· ·I took the AFOQT and the PCSM, which is12· ·programs with which you were familiar at that time would 12· ·P-C-S-M.13· ·have -- you would have come out with another bachelor's 13· · · · · · ·Q.· ·When did you take the AFOQT?14· ·degree rather than with a master's degree; is that 14· · · · · · ·A.· ·I took it after college.· I'm not sure of15· ·correct? 15· ·the dates.· I could find them.16· · · · · · ·A.· ·If I went in the civilian side, yes. 16· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Do you --17· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Okay. 17· · · · · · ·A.· ·But I would say around 2010, maybe '12.18· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes. 18· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Do you remember where you took it?19· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Did you actually apply for any graduate 19· · · · · · ·A.· ·I took it in, I believe, Washington D.C.20· ·schools or other bachelor-level programs before you 20· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Do you remember what score you achieved on21· ·decided to try to go into the Air Force? 21· ·it?22· · · · · · ·A.· ·I had applied to Embry-Riddle junior year, 22· · · · · · ·A.· ·I don't remember all the scores but I was23· ·got in; but, again, financially, I was already a junior. 23· ·extremely high on the pilot and navigation; and with the24· ·So there was -- I decided to wait and then take my 24· ·PCSM, which is a score that they derive how successful25· ·service of my country and go in that route. 25· ·you'll be in pilot training, I was in the 90s. Stevens-Koenig Reporting ·Pages 17–20 303-988-8470· www.SKReporting.com YVer1fAndrew D. Lee vs. Video Deposition of Andrew David LeeGregory D. Welk December 18, 2017 Page 21 Page 23·1· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Where did you take the PCSM? ·1· ·you can say they're applications, but they're more·2· · · · · · ·A.· ·The PCSM was -- that may have been ·2· ·paperwork.· That was developed when I decided which was·3· ·Maryland actually. ·3· ·2008, 2009.·4· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And do you recall when you took the PCSM? ·4· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And let me put it that way then.· When did·5· · · · · · ·A.· ·It was after the AFOQT.· So I would ·5· ·you decide to enlist in the Air Force?·6· ·imagine 2012 after. ·6· · · · · · ·A.· ·It was January 7th of 2009.·7· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And your recollection is that the score on ·7· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And how did you enlist?· What process did·8· ·the PCSM was in the 90s? ·8· ·you go through to enlist, as you can recall?·9· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes. ·9· · · · · · ·A.· ·Just the regular process.· I went -- took10· · · · · · ·Q.· ·After you received your bachelor of arts 10· ·the ASVAB.· From that, they told me which positions I11· ·degree in New Hampshire but before you made the decision 11· ·could take.· My score was good enough to where they said12· ·to go into the Air Force, did you apply for any other 12· ·I could have any position within the enlisted realm. I13· ·jobs? 13· ·then went to MEPS which is your medical.· I got checked14· · · · · · ·A.· ·Just regular jobs? 14· ·off on all those things and then, you know, January15· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Yeah. 15· ·9th -- or January 7th my parents came in and I swore in;16· · · · · · ·A.· ·I don't know if I would say it -- well, I 16· ·and within the next, I'd say, six months to a year, I17· ·probably applied to some positions to have some sort of 17· ·then went to basic training.18· ·income while waiting for application, interview; and then 18· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And when you say "January 9th,"19· ·we all know the government works very slowly -- 19· ·January 9th of which year?20· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Do you remember -- 20· · · · · · ·A.· ·2009.21· · · · · · ·A.· ·-- appointment to -- 21· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· When you --22· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Do you remember where you applied at all? 22· · · · · · ·A.· ·And I believe it's January 7th actually.23· · · · · · ·A.· ·At that time it was 2008ish; and our 23· · · · · · ·Q.· ·When you decided to enlist, did you just24· ·economy was not doing well, especially on the East Coast. 24· ·walk into a recruiting office?· Was there someone who25· ·I would say everything that was available. 25· ·came to meet with you on campus?· How did that come Page 22 Page 24·1· · · · · · ·Q.· ·I mean, are we talking retail, restaurant ·1· ·about?·2· ·work?· What are we talking? ·2· · · · · · ·A.· ·Again, I know -- it had always been in the·3· · · · · · ·A.· ·I wound up in restaurant work and ·3· ·back of my mind that I wanted to do it.· I had to get·4· ·construction at the time because that's geographically ·4· ·done with school first, and I wanted to get everything·5· ·what my -- what is available in my area of -- of home, ·5· ·ready to eventually do the crossover to piloting.· That·6· ·where I'm from.· I also applied to New York, Philadelphia ·6· ·was getting the 3.0.· That was getting the degree,·7· ·in finance.· Geography is not so big out there which ·7· ·getting the minor as well.·8· ·would be GIS positions and things like that; but if I saw ·8· · · · · · · · · So prior to even January, I had gone -- I·9· ·one, I applied to.· So I would say from, you know, like, ·9· ·actually researched the Navy, the Air Force, the Coast10· ·finance -- finance to architectural geography, GIS, and 10· ·Guard, every single branch; but I wanted to fly in the11· ·everything in between. 11· ·branch that I could fly in which was the Air Force.· So12· · · · · · ·Q.· ·When did you make the decision to attempt 12· ·over years I had kind of filtered it out to the Air13· ·to get involved in the Air Force? 13· ·Force.· I'd say prior -- six months prior to a year prior14· · · · · · ·A.· ·It will sound funny; but when I was 14· ·from January 7th, I knew that I was going to do it; and I15· ·approximately 12 years old, I knew that I wanted to fly 15· ·started to talk.· I went to a recruiter in the mall and16· ·and be in the military.· To actually take the oath, that 16· ·began to do the paperwork to see if I was even eligible17· ·was in 2008, 2009 range; but I've always wanted to do 17· ·to be in the military.18· ·that. 18· · · · · · ·Q.· ·You say that you did some research on19· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Even before you took the oath, when did 19· ·being able to fly through the Navy, for example, the Air20· ·you decide to submit application paperwork to the Air 20· ·Force.· How did you go about doing that research?21· ·Force? 21· · · · · · ·A.· ·I called almost every recruiter of every22· · · · · · ·A.· ·Application would have been what I would 22· ·branch.· I talked to prior service individuals I knew23· ·consider flying.· So that would be officer training. 23· ·through family members, prior service individuals who24· ·Those were applications.· The ASVAB -- I actually 24· ·went through flight school and then became a commercial25· ·enlisted after college.· So the ASVAB and things like -- 25· ·pilot after their military career which is what I wanted Stevens-Koenig Reporting ·Pages 21–24 303-988-8470· www.SKReporting.com YVer1fAndrew D. Lee vs. Video Deposition of Andrew David LeeGregory D. Welk December 18, 2017 Page 25 Page 27·1· ·to do.· I did that.· I looked through the internet. I ·1· ·accepted; and the range was -- like I said, you had the·2· ·got books.· I mean, from when I -- prior to when I even ·2· ·lower guys -- you had outliers which was 4 and you had·3· ·graduated, I would be at the library -- public library, ·3· ·outliers of 2.7 and everything in the middle.· I'd·4· ·school library picking up OTS books, getting AFOQT study ·4· ·imagine, yes, the vast majority of them are around, you·5· ·guides, et cetera.· So pretty much from A to Z. ·5· ·know -- I mean, 3.5 is in the middle there; but it wasn't·6· · · · · · ·Q.· ·You testified a time or two here that it ·6· ·a disqualifying factor if you had less or had more.·7· ·was important that you got a 3.0 in college, right? ·7· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Do you know how -- I mean, as part of the·8· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes. ·8· ·research that you did, do you know what percentage of·9· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And what was your understanding about why ·9· ·people who seek to become officers in the Air Force10· ·that was important? 10· ·attempt to become pilots?11· · · · · · ·A.· ·That was the threshold to become a pilot. 11· · · · · · ·A.· ·I don't know numberswise.· I know that12· ·That was one of the requirements -- 12· ·it's a very, very, very small percentage are actually13· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And where did you -- 13· ·eligible to even be an officer.· It's an even -- of14· · · · · · ·A.· ·-- to be competitive. 14· ·civilians in general because you have medical.· You have15· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Where did you obtain the information that 15· ·all these different things that you have to be, mentally16· ·a 3.0 was a threshold requirement to become a pilot in 16· ·sound, physically able, et cetera, et cetera,17· ·the Air Force? 17· ·educationally competitive, if you will, for lack of18· · · · · · ·A.· ·I believe it's technically -- it can be 18· ·better terms right now.· That fraction of what I've19· ·less; but to be competitive, to even put any GPA on your 19· ·heard -- this is just what I've heard.· I've never20· ·resume, I know for, like, kind of a fact, if you will -- 20· ·actually looked into that but -- is a third of the21· ·I don't know if it's a requirement, but they say that. 21· ·population.· The population is a third of that that can22· ·You should have a 3.0 or more when applying to anything. 22· ·actually be an officer.· A third of that is what actually23· ·But if you look into the Air Force, if you go to base 23· ·can get into pilot training.24· ·ops -- there's a couple of different websites -- it will 24· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· And that's -- when you say that's25· ·give you something that says if you have a 3.0 or above, 25· ·what you've heard, that's just discussion you've heard Page 26 Page 28·1· ·you're highly -- not qualified -- highly wanted, highly ·1· ·among friends?·2· ·sought after.· Something below, they may look right over ·2· · · · · · ·A.· ·Just discussion which I don't take --·3· ·you. ·3· ·which I don't warrant.·4· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Did you do any research into the average ·4· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Would you agree, though, that the number·5· ·GPA that a successful pilot trainee actually has coming ·5· ·of people in the Air Force who want to become pilots·6· ·out of college? ·6· ·dramatically exceeds the number of pilot slots that are·7· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes. ·7· ·actually available in the Air Force?·8· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And what was the average that you ·8· · · · · · ·A.· ·Pretty much everyone I've ever talked to·9· ·understood? ·9· ·in my eight-year career wanted to fly; and the bitter10· · · · · · ·A.· ·I don't know exactly but it could have 10· ·individuals would, you know, make fun of the people that11· ·ranged -- and, like I said, the -- the bottom was, I 11· ·wanted to fly which I got a lot because they're like "Oh,12· ·believe, around 2.7 actually; and it ranged up to just 12· ·you're just another statistic."13· ·below a four.· And I'm sure some pilots have a four. 13· · · · · · · · · Although, yes, the amount that want to get14· · · · · · ·Q.· ·When you say you researched what the 14· ·in there and want to be -- vast and even that aren't in15· ·average successful pilot applicant GPA was, how did you 15· ·or are in other services.· But the ones that actually get16· ·go about doing that research? 16· ·into training, it's a very, very small percentage.17· · · · · · ·A.· ·That, again, would probably be one of 17· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And you were enlisted in the Air Force,18· ·those sites -- base ops and there's a couple of other 18· ·correct?19· ·sites as well -- that are actual pilots that are -- had 19· · · · · · ·A.· ·Originally, yes.20· ·been successful, and they share that information with 20· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And you also attended at least a portion21· ·individuals. 21· ·of an officer training school; is that correct.22· · · · · · ·Q.· ·In part of your research, did you see that 22· · · · · · ·A.· ·I had completed everything in officer23· ·over the last ten years the average successful pilot 23· ·training.· We were actually doing the training -- the24· ·applicant actually has a GPA of 3.5 or higher? 24· ·marching training and things like that, perfecting that25· · · · · · ·A.· ·Again, I looked at the range of which was 25· ·for our parents to come down; and that was three days Stevens-Koenig Reporting ·Pages 25–28 303-988-8470· www.SKReporting.com YVer1fAndrew D. Lee vs. Video Deposition of Andrew David LeeGregory D. Welk December 18, 2017 Page 29 Page 31·1· ·when the incident in which I supplied you the appeal ·1· · · · · · ·Q.· ·You've indicated that there are around 65·2· ·paperwork with happened. ·2· ·people in your flight.· True?·3· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And within the time that you were an ·3· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.·4· ·enlisted person in the Air Force as well as when you were ·4· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And the Air Force is not going to have any·5· ·part of the OTS program, did you encounter a number of ·5· ·one of those 65 people that they know is not medically·6· ·people who had at least a 3.0 GPA? ·6· ·cleared already, correct, at least to your understanding?·7· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yeah. ·7· · · · · · ·A.· ·They won't -- there's different medical·8· · · · · · ·Q.· ·A number of people who had -- you know, ·8· ·clearances.· So medical clearance to be in just the --·9· ·seemed to be intelligent, focused, bright people? ·9· ·and I supplied you -- I believe we did.· I don't know.10· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.· We had everything from bachelor's of 10· ·It's six -- sixty-one -- 6130.03.· That is the medical11· ·arts like myself to -- I believe one individual was 11· ·documentation to be in the armed forces whatsoever.· From12· ·looking in or had interned or worked in NASA.· So from A 12· ·that you have other medical documentation or medical13· ·to Z. 13· ·screening you have to pass.14· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And even with all that, it was your 14· · · · · · · · · One of the most competitive is pilot and15· ·understanding that even among this pool of educated, 15· ·spec ops.· There were no spec ops in my flight that I16· ·bright, focused people, most of those folks could not 16· ·knew of.· You know, they could go that route later.17· ·become pilots; is that correct? 17· ·There were pilots; but, again, that is one of the hardest18· · · · · · ·A.· ·At that point where I was in OTS and that 18· ·medical requirements to meet medical -- sorry for the19· ·number, I know that it's actually increased as well 19· ·lack of verbiage but medical -- what would you call it --20· ·because what happened, the baby boomers are kind of 20· ·screenings to get into and to pass.21· ·fizzling out, if you will.· The need for pilots has 21· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Let me come at this a little bit different22· ·drastically increased, especially when I was there.· They 22· ·way.· The Air Force, to your understanding, is not going23· ·were bringing more people in and actually switching some 23· ·to let anyone into that group of 65 that they understand24· ·people over from their original career paths to become 24· ·from the beginning is not qualified to become an officer.25· ·pilots.· From what I knew, what I can remember, I would 25· ·True? Page 30 Page 32·1· ·say it was approximately half and half in my -- in my ·1· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.·2· ·flight. ·2· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Which means that, at least to the·3· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Half of the people in OTS were pursuing ·3· ·information the Air Force has when everybody starts up,·4· ·some type of pilot training further and half were not? ·4· ·they've passed the -- whatever relevant medical·5· ·Is that what you mean? ·5· ·qualification applies to their specialty.· True?·6· · · · · · ·A.· ·In my flight.· So a flight is a ·6· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.· You have to attend MEPS before you·7· ·fraction -- I'd say there was about 65 people in my ·7· ·can go to OTS --·8· ·flight.· In the squadron, it would have consisted of ·8· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Right.·9· ·approximately four more flights.· I knew mostly just ·9· · · · · · ·A.· ·-- and be cleared.10· ·about my flight. 10· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And they would have to have the minimum11· · · · · · ·Q.· ·So within your flight of people who were 11· ·college GPA or other entrance score necessary to get into12· ·at least officially eligible for officer training, right? 12· ·OTS, right?13· · · · · · ·A.· ·Uh-huh. 13· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.· There are exceptions.14· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Yes? 14· · · · · · ·Q.· ·You can get a waiver sometimes, right?15· · · · · · ·A.· ·They were. 15· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes, sir.16· · · · · · ·Q.· ·They were at least officially eligible for 16· · · · · · ·Q.· ·But in order just to get into the OTS17· ·officer training; is that correct, everyone in the OTS 17· ·program and begin the training, you would have to have18· ·flight that you were part of? 18· ·persuaded the Air Force that you meet the minimum19· · · · · · ·A.· ·The way I went about it and the way anyone 19· ·requirements to become an officer or that you can obtain20· ·who was given an officer's slot in the fact of Air 20· ·a waiver of those requirements, right?21· ·Force -- or I'm sorry.· Pardon me -- in the fact of 21· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.· The way it happens is you meet an22· ·flying, they were already medically cleared, et cetera, 22· ·officer accessions recruiter.· The officer accessions23· ·et cetera, because what would happen is after the eight 23· ·recruiter creates a package.· The package includes, you24· ·and a half, nine weeks of OTS, you're going straight into 24· ·know, "I took the trash out for my neighbor next door" to25· ·IFS which is initial flight screening. 25· ·"I got my degree.· Well, what did you get your degree in? Stevens-Koenig Reporting ·Pages 29–32 303-988-8470· www.SKReporting.com YVer1fAndrew D. Lee vs. Video Deposition of Andrew David LeeGregory D. Welk December 18, 2017 Page 33 Page 35·1· ·If you got a minor as well, what was the GPA?· Have you ·1· ·program, you would not become a pilot in the Air Force,·2· ·ever done anything criminally?"· You know, so criminal ·2· ·would you?·3· ·background check as well as height, weight, vision.· Then ·3· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.· That is true.·4· ·we get into MEPS passing. ·4· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· And in the Air Force, if you look·5· · · · · · · · · Like I said, the piloting is -- is a ·5· ·at all of the officers in the Air Force, the great·6· ·little bit divorced because it's even more things you ·6· ·majority of them are not pilots, right?·7· ·have to pass; but depending on what you want with that ·7· · · · · · ·A.· ·That's true.·8· ·officer accessions recruiter, they develop a package. ·8· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· There are a lot of other·9· ·That package is then sent into -- I don't know if it's ·9· ·opportunities in the Air Force for officers that don't10· ·the headquarters of the Air -- there's -- I think there's 10· ·involve flying a plane?11· ·a couple of headquarters within the state, I believe. 11· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.12· ·Those individuals look at the things.· If they have 12· · · · · · ·Q.· ·When you enlisted in the Air Force, did13· ·waivers, they grant the waivers; and those are the 13· ·you enlist active duty, reserves, Air National Guard?14· ·individuals that say, "This person can go.· This person 14· · · · · · ·A.· ·Air National Guard.15· ·can go.· This person can go.· These applications, no." 15· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And that was in New Hampshire?16· · · · · · ·Q.· ·A little bit like applying for college in 16· · · · · · ·A.· ·New Jersey.17· ·some respects, right?· You submit a whole packet with 17· · · · · · ·Q.· ·New Jersey.· How long were you in the Air18· ·essays and information about yourself; and ultimately 18· ·National Guard as an enlisted person in New Jersey?19· ·someone decides whether you meet the qualifications, 19· · · · · · ·A.· ·I don't know the dates exactly.· I could20· ·whether they want you in the program? 20· ·find them.· I wound up starting to make the motions to21· · · · · · ·A.· ·Very -- very similar.· Just I'd say a 21· ·transfer to -- my first position was in New Jersey.· Then22· ·little different because it's -- you don't have to be 22· ·I wanted to get into intel to make my -- excuse me --23· ·medically necessarily qualified for college. 23· ·package more presentable to become a pilot.· At that24· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And of all the very -- do you have -- do 24· ·point I moved to Massachusetts; and then as I was making25· ·you know of the number of people who apply to OTS, what 25· ·the motions to get into the Massachusetts as intel, I was Page 34 Page 36·1· ·the acceptance rate is?· How many people actually get in? ·1· ·picked up to go for a commission for a pilot.·2· ·What percentage? ·2· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· So you were in the National Guard·3· · · · · · ·A.· ·I didn't look at that, to be honest. ·3· ·in New Jersey?·4· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And in your flight, most of the people or ·4· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.·5· ·at least half of the people who are in that flight were ·5· · · · · · ·Q.· ·You made a decision to move to·6· ·not necessarily going to go on to pilot training; is that ·6· ·Massachusetts, right?·7· ·right, even if they successfully completed OTS? ·7· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.·8· · · · · · ·A.· ·That's correct. ·8· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Were you going to be part of the Air·9· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And if a person was -- well, in order to ·9· ·National Guard in Massachusetts?10· ·be able to pursue initial flight training after OTS, 10· · · · · · ·A.· ·Air National Guard, yes.11· ·you'd, first of all, have to get one of the limited 11· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· Were you ever actually accepted12· ·number of slots for -- for a pilot in OTS; is that true? 12· ·into the Air National Guard in Massachusetts?13· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes. 13· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.14· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And then you would have to successfully 14· · · · · · ·Q.· ·How long were you in the Air National15· ·complete OTS before you could advance to flight training, 15· ·Guard in Massachusetts?16· ·right? 16· · · · · · ·A.· ·I would say approximately six to eight17· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes. 17· ·months.· I had been accepted there and was about to get18· · · · · · ·Q.· ·If you were not able to successfully 18· ·school dates for intel -- intelligence -- operations19· ·complete OTS, you would not be able to become a pilot in 19· ·intelligence.· Although, while I was heading up to20· ·the Air Force, right? 20· ·Massachusetts, my application was accepted around21· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.· You have to become an officer prior 21· ·Christmastime to become a pilot; and I had to talk to the22· ·to being a pilot.· Yes. 22· ·chief and to the administration there to say, "Hey, I got23· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And even if you were successful in 23· ·my dream job.· Is there -- can we start to make the24· ·completing officer training school, if you washed out of 24· ·motions of now getting out and going into, you know, OTS25· ·or were otherwise unsuccessful in the flight training 25· ·and doing that?" Stevens-Koenig Reporting ·Pages 33–36 303-988-8470· www.SKReporting.com YVer1fAndrew D. Lee vs. Video Deposition of Andrew David LeeGregory D. Welk December 18, 2017 Page 37 Page 39·1· · · · · · ·Q.· ·So you had applied for OTS prior to your ·1· ·an exam by an FAA-certified instructor which that's the·2· ·move to Massachusetts? ·2· ·last -- that's when they finally sign the documents, and·3· · · · · · ·A.· ·I had been applying after I got my private ·3· ·you become a private pilot.·4· ·pilot's license in 2012 because that's another feather in ·4· · · · · · ·Q.· ·What -- well, did you go through a flight·5· ·my cap I wanted to put within the package.· I had ·5· ·training school or flight training service to get your·6· ·about -- approximately 80 to 90 hour -- I think I do now. ·6· ·license?·7· ·And that was a big help because that helps with the PCSM ·7· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.·8· ·score.· It helps with everything else, and it shows that ·8· · · · · · ·Q.· ·What school did you go through?·9· ·I can fly a plane. ·9· · · · · · ·A.· ·It's Ace Pilot Training Allentown,10· · · · · · ·Q.· ·What -- I take it to get a civilian 10· ·Pennsylvania.11· ·pilot -- it's a civilian pilot's license, right? 11· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And was there a particular instructor that12· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes, sir. 12· ·you worked with or a set of instructors you can recall13· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And I take it to get a civilian pilot's 13· ·working with?14· ·license, you would have had to complete some formal 14· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.· I worked with Keith Anderson.· He15· ·education in -- in flying an aircraft? 15· ·was the individual that instructed me.· I believe I had16· · · · · · ·A.· ·It's -- there's different ways to obtain 16· ·an instructor before that.· I don't remember him.· It was17· ·it.· The way I obtained it was a part -- a 141 -- 17· ·two or three hours just when I started to -- almost start18· ·Part 141 which is the more -- there's a Part 141 and, I 18· ·to land, and then they switched me over to Keith.· So we19· ·believe, a 61.· The 61 is not as stringent and is kind 19· ·had to kind of like mesh again, if you will.· I had him20· ·of -- they're a little bit more liberal with how you do 20· ·predominantly; and then, like I said, there was an21· ·your hours, and it's less structured.· That's the term 21· ·instructor -- an FAA instructor.· You only spend an hour22· ·I'm looking for.· The 141 is very structured.· It bodes 22· ·with him -- hour to two, and they go out and check you on23· ·well, if you complete a 141, when applying.· So that's 23· ·everything and give you a flight check in order to become24· ·what I did. 24· ·a private pilot.25· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And a 141 would require that you have 25· · · · · · ·Q.· ·The FAA instructor, to your understanding, Page 38 Page 40·1· ·classroom instruction, correct? ·1· ·that was a person charged with evaluating you rather than·2· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.· Class -- ·2· ·teaching you?·3· · · · · · ·Q.· ·It would require -- ·3· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes.·4· · · · · · ·A.· ·I'm sorry.· Go ahead. ·4· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Okay.· And do you remember who that person·5· · · · · · ·Q.· ·It would require that you have the ·5· ·was?·6· ·instruction in an aircraft with an instructor, right? ·6· · · · · · ·A.· ·I don't remember his name.· I'm sure it's·7· · · · · · ·A.· ·Uh-huh. ·7· ·on some documentation somewhere.·8· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Yes? ·8· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Aside from wanting the private pilot's·9· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes. ·9· ·license, as you say, to be a feather in your cap for the10· · · · · · ·Q.· ·It would require that you also demonstrate 10· ·application process in the Air Force, have you used your11· ·the ability to take off, land, and fly without an 11· ·private pilot's license in any professional or commercial12· ·instructor, correct? 12· ·capacity?13· · · · · · ·A.· ·Yes. 13· · · · · · ·A.· ·I cannot use a private pilot's license14· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And you would have to -- do you know how 14· ·until I would obtain a commercial -- what would you call15· ·many hours you would have to accrue in a particular type 15· ·it -- certification for any sort of money or anything16· ·of aircraft that you're trying to get licensure for under 16· ·like that.· The only things I could do is charity; and,17· ·141? 17· ·no, I have not.18· · · · · · ·A.· ·So in the 141 I have a single-engine 18· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Have you taken any steps toward getting a19· ·aircraft with a land qualification.· I think the least 19· ·commercial certification?20· ·amount of hours you can obtain that is in 35 which is 20· · · · · · ·A.· ·I had stopped -- not necessarily my pilot21· ·highly unheard of.· The national average, I believe, is 21· ·training but I got the private pilot's license, had the22· ·between 50 to 60.· You have to -- like you said, 22· ·package to get in, got accepted and with all those23· ·classroom, ground instruction as well as flight.· You 23· ·different things of getting my life in order to go to two24· ·have to be able to take off and actually complete a 24· ·and a half years of training, I had ceased flying at that25· ·flight, and then you are given a written exam as well as 25· ·point. Stevens-Koenig Reporting ·Pages 37–40 303-988-8470· www.SKReporting.com YVer1fAndrew D. Lee vs. Video Deposition of Andrew David LeeGregory D. Welk December 18, 2017 Page 41 Page 43·1· · · · · · ·Q.· ·When you were in the Air National Guard ·1· ·slated to go to school.· Like I said to you, they had --·2· ·out in New Jersey, what was your MOS or specialty? ·2· ·were just about to get me dates down in San Angelo; but·3· · · · · · ·A.· ·I was a tactical aircraft maintenance ·3· ·once the pilot thing came to be and they all found out·4· ·specialist. ·4· ·about it and my -- he's actually chief master sergeant,·5· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And I would presume that you attended a ·5· ·my flight chief there was like "Okay.· Andrew, you know,·6· ·number of schools or trainings while you were in New ·6· ·we're going to get you going this route.· Do your dream."·7· ·Jersey with the Air National Guard? ·7· ·So --·8· · · · · · ·A.· ·They actually send you on active duty, and ·8· · · · · · ·Q.· ·And from the time -- well, first of all,·9· ·I went through all of my school -- my cold training, ·9· ·when did you relocate to Massachusetts?10· ·which they call it, was in San Antonio; and my hot 10· · · · · · ·A.· ·I actually didn't relocate because after11· ·training was in Arizona at Luke Air Force Base.· And then 11· ·the -- after the month or so that I found that out, I12· ·I had follow-on training when I came back. 12· ·wound up driving every -- so it's one weekend a month,13· · · · · · ·Q.· ·Did you deploy at all while you were part 13· ·two weeks a year.· So every month that I had to go up, I14· ·of the National Guard -- Air National Guard in New 14· ·would stay at my sister's in Rhode Island and go there15· ·Jersey? 15· ·and then do the eight

Related Contentin Denver County

Case

Thiel, Joshua v. Community Mgmt Specialists et al

Aug 13, 2024 |J Eric Elliff |Personal Injury |2024CV032458

Case

C And C Of Denver v. Montgomery, Chadwick

Aug 12, 2024 |Mark T Bailey |Property Damage |2024CV032454

Case

Alegria, Mayra v. Lorenzi, Faith et al

Aug 13, 2024 |Andrew J Luxen |Personal Injury Motor Vehicle |2024CV032464

Case

Burback, David v. Alvarez Reyes, Miguel et al

Aug 12, 2024 |Jon Jay Olafson |Personal Injury Motor Vehicle |2024CV032450

Case

Pino, Susan v. Krug, Carleen

Aug 16, 2024 |Kandace Gerdes |Personal Injury Motor Vehicle |2024CV032501

Case

Schaible, Zachary v. Lim MD, James et al

Aug 14, 2024 |J Eric Elliff |Malpractice |2024CV032485

Case

Noor, Liban Jama v. Oh, Paul

Andrew Patrick Mccallin |Personal Injury Motor Vehicle |2024CV032455

Case

Moseneder, Siegfried v. Tran, Xuong

Aug 13, 2024 |Kandace Gerdes |Personal Injury Motor Vehicle |2024CV032461

Case

Lifshen, Daniel v. Wareashby, Penny

Aug 16, 2024 |Mark T Bailey |Personal Injury Motor Vehicle |2024CV032508

Ruling

Elizabeth Alvarado vs Leta Vannest, et al.

Aug 14, 2024 |23CV-01152

23CV-01152 Elizabeth Alvarado v. Leta Vannest, et al.Trial Setting ConferenceAppearance required. Remote appearances are permitted. Parties who wish to appearremotely must contact the clerk of the court at (209) 725-4111 to arrange for a remoteappearance. Appear to address the status of the case.

Ruling

POLE, NICHOLAS vs WALMART STORES INC

Aug 14, 2024 |CV-21-000751

CV-21-000751 – POLE, NICHOLAS vs WALMART STORES INC – Defendant Walmart, INC’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions – WITHDRAWN.

Ruling

DAVID KELLY VS TARA BARNHART, ET AL.

Aug 12, 2024 |22STCV26250

Case Number: 22STCV26250 Hearing Date: August 12, 2024 Dept: 34 Cross-Defendant Blaine Ikedas Demurrer to Cross-Complainant Razmik Abkarians Cross-Complaint is SUSTAINED. The court will inquire whether leave should be granted. Background Factual and Procedural Background On October 26, 2023, Blain Ikeda (Ikeda or Cross-Defendant) filed an initial Complaint on his own behalf and on behalf of PharmaRX Pharmaceutical, Inc. (PharmaRX) alleging four causes of action against Razmik Abkarians (Abkarians or Cross-Complainant): (1) fraud, (2) conversion, (3) breach of fiduciary duty, and (4) accounting. In October of 2003, Ikeda and Abkarians formed PharmaRX a company that manufactures and sells prescription pharmaceuticals. The causes of action stem from allegations that Abkarians gave himself an unauthorized salary increase and took unauthorized direct payments from PharmaRX. (Complaint, ¶¶10-13.) Ikeda alleges in his initial Complaint that Abkarians diverted $907,530.97 in corporate funds to himself. (Complaint, ¶15.) On April 29, 2024, Abkarians filed a Cross-Complaint in which he lists three causes of action in the caption of the Cross-Complaint but alleges nine in the body of the Cross-Complaint. Abkarians alleges that he brings the Cross-Complaint on behalf of himself, PharmaRX, and PharmaRX Hawaii, LLC (PharmaRX Hawaii). Abkarians alleges that both PharmaRX and PharmaRX Hawaii manufacture and sell prescription pharmaceuticals. (Cross-Complaint, ¶8.) The causes of action stem from allegations Ikeda refused to submit required forms or pay General Excise Taxes when due to the State of Hawaii, even after collecting General Excise Taxes from customers. (Cross-Complaint, ¶10.) Abkarians additionally alleges that that there is an account receivable from PharmaRX Hawaiis primary customer, Marian Medical Services, LLC in the amount of $1.5-2million. (Cross-Complaint, ¶12.) However, despite repeated demands to do so, Ikeda allegedly has refused to take actions to recover said amount. (Id.) Abkarians additionally alleges that although he is a 50% shareholder in both companies, Abkarians has not been compensated from PharmaRX Hawaii. (Cross-Complaint, ¶13.) Finally, Abkarians alleges there is some undisclosed nefarious deal between Ikeda and Marian Medical Services, LLC that has resulted in Ikedas failure to pursue the collection. The nine causes of action are: 1. Fraud (brought derivatively and on behalf of PharmaRX Hawaii) 2. Fraud (brought derivatively and on behalf of PharmaRX) 3. Fraud (brought derivatively and on behalf of Abkarians) 4. Breach of Fiduciary Duties (brought derivatively and on behalf of PharmaRX Hawaii) 5. Breach of Fiduciary Duties (brought derivatively and on behalf of PharmaRX) 6. Breach of Fiduciary Duties (brought derivatively and on behalf of Abkarians) 7. Accounting (brought derivatively and on behalf of PharmaRX Hawaii) 8. Accounting (brought derivatively and on behalf of PharmaRX) 9. Accounting (brought derivatively and on behalf of Abkarians) The motion now before the court is Cross-Defendant Blaine Ikedas Demurrer to Cross-Complainant Razmik Abkarians Cross-Complaint. Ikeda demurs to the first three causes of action, which allege fraud. Abkarians opposes the demurrer, Ikeda files a reply. Meet and Confer Before filing a demurrer&the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. (Code Civ. Proc. §430.41(a).) Attached to the demurrer, Cross-Defendant submits the Declaration of Wendy L. Slavkin (Slavkin Decl.) which states that a meet and confer letter was sent to counsel on May 10, 2024, but that Cross-Complainants counsel never responded. (Slavkin Decl. ¶¶3-4.) Therefore, the requirements of Code Civ. Proc. §430.41(a) remain unsatisfied. However, per Code Civ. Proc. §430.41(a)(4), A determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. Accordingly, the court will now turn its attention to the demurrer. Discussion Legal Standard [A] demurrer tests the legal sufficiency of the allegations in a complaint. (Lewis v. Safeway, Inc. (2015) 235 Cal.App.4th 385, 388.) A demurrer can be used only to challenge defects that appear on the face of the pleading under attack or from matters outside the pleading that are judicially noticeable. (See Donabedian v. Mercury Ins. Co. (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 968, 994 [in ruling on a demurrer, a court may not consider declarations, matters not subject to judicial notice, or documents not accepted for the truth of their contents].) For purposes of ruling on a demurrer, all facts pleaded in a complaint are assumed to be true, but the reviewing court does not assume the truth of conclusions of law. (Aubry v. Tri-City Hosp. Dist. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 962, 967.) Analysis The first three causes of action are all brought against Cross-Defendant and allege fraud because (a) Cross-Defendant failed to file Hawaii General Excise Tax forms (Cross-Complaint, ¶10), (b) failed to pursue any action to collect an open account with a customer for PharmaRX Hawaii (Cross-Complaint ¶12), and (c) failed to compensate Cross-Complainant for services to PharmaRX Hawaii. (Cross-Complaint, ¶13.) The elements of fraud are (a) a misrepresentation (false representation, concealment, or nondisclosure); (b) scienter or knowledge of its falsity; (c) intent to induce reliance; (d) justifiable reliance; and (e) resulting damage. (Hinesley v. Oakshade Town Ctr. (2005) 135 Cal.App.4th 289, 294.) The facts constituting the alleged fraud must be alleged factually and specifically as to every element of fraud, as the policy of liberal construction of the pleadings will not ordinarily be invoked. (Lazar v. Superior Court (1996) 12 Cal.4th 631, 645.) To properly allege fraud against a corporation, the plaintiffs must plead the names of the persons allegedly making the false representations, their authority to speak, to whom they spoke, what they said or wrote, and when it was said or written. (Tarmann v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (1991) 2 Cal.App.4th 153, 157.) Upon demurrer Cross-Defendant contends that the Cross-Complaint fails to allege fraud against Cross-Defendant with the proper specificity. The court agrees. The Cross-Complaint speaks in general and conclusive terms as to what acts occurred, for example the failure to file General Excise Tax forms and failure to collect on an open account. However, there is no allegation of a misrepresentation made by Cross-Defendant to Cross-Complainant. There is no allegation that any misrepresentation was known to be false, nor made to induce reliance. Upon opposition, Cross-Complainant argues that the Cross-Complaint alleges Cross-Defendant was committing theft from the state of Hawaii by failing to file General Excise Tax forms. Although both Cross-Defendant and Cross-Complainant could be liable for unremitted funds, without further specifics, it is unclear how this relates to the fraud claim, especially as there are no allegations that PharmaRX Hawaii is being investigated or pursued for tax fraud. Additionally, the allegation that Cross-Defendant failed to collect money owed lacks any relation to the fraud claim. No details are provided as to how there was a false representation, concealment, or nondisclosure of information that would constitute any element of fraud. Finally, Cross-Complainants allegation that he has not been compensated for his services to PharmaRX Hawaii is insufficient for the court to sustain a fraud allegation without more particulars. As such, Cross-Defendants demurrer to the Cross-Complaint is sustained in its entirety. Leave to Amend Leave to amend must be allowed where there is a reasonable possibility of successful amendment. (See Goodman v. Kennedy (1976) 18 Cal.3d 335, 349 [court shall not sustain a demurrer without leave to amend if there is any reasonable possibility that the defect can be cured by amendment]. The court will inquire whether leave should be granted. Conclusion Accordingly, Cross-Defendant Blaine Ikedas Demurrer to Cross-Complainant Razmik Abkarians Cross-Complaint is SUSTAINED in its entirety.

Ruling

Pamela Cooper vs. Yaquelin Reyes

Aug 12, 2024 |C23-01112

C23-01112 CASE NAME: PAMELA COOPER VS. YAQUELIN REYES *HEARING ON MOTION IN RE: TO QUASH PLTFS SUBPOENA TO THIRD-PARTY MULTIPRO PROPERTY SOLUTIONS FILED BY: GUARDIAN-KW HILLTOP LLC *TENTATIVE RULING:*The hearing is continued to August 19, 2024, in Department 9 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff’s counsel issanctioned $250 for a failure to meet and confer. (See Code of Civil Procedure § 2023.010 (i).) Theparties are ordered to meet and confer, and then submit a joint written statement by August 15, 2024,summarizing any issues remaining in dispute and the efforts they have made to resolve those issues.

Ruling

HULBERT vs. CROSS

Aug 14, 2024 |CVPO18-0190446

HULBERT VS. CROSSCase Number: CVPO18-0190446This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of medical expert and Public Defender’sassistance. The Court has Ordered Darren Hulbert’s remote appearance for today’s hearing via aJune 26, 2024 Order, which has been submitted to the litigation coordinator at the inmate’s facilityas previously. The Court notes that Shasta County Counsel has filed a Motion on behalf of theShasta County Public Defender seeking relief from appointment. An appearance is necessaryon today’s calendar.PIT RIVER TRIBE, ET AL. VS. CALIFORNIA ENERGY

Ruling

LAM vs ROHR, INC.

Aug 14, 2024 |CVRI2305206

DEMURRER ON 2ND AMENDEDCOMPLAINT FORCVRI2305206 LAM VS ROHR, INC.ENVIRONMENTAL/TOXIC TORT OFDANIEL LAMTentative Ruling: Appearances requested; plaintiff’s counsel was to have filed a declaration byAugust 7 with potential additional facts to be alleged, but no declaration received.

Ruling

DAVID WILLIAMS vs JOHNATHAN WEBER, et al

Aug 12, 2024 |24CV00661

24CV00661WILLIAMS v. WEBER MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL The unopposed motion to be relieved as counsel filed by Alivia Abreu is granted as itcomplies with California Rules of Court, Rule, 3.1362. Ms. Abreu is directed to submit anupdated proposed order for the court to sign with the correct upcoming hearing dates. Theproposed order before the court indicates a future date of July 5, 2024.Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal orderincorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating thetentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, inaccordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if theprevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing (unless the tentative issimply to “grant”). Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition ofsanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.

Ruling

NANETTE KINKADE, ET AL. VS ART BRAND STUDIOS, LLC, ET AL.

Aug 13, 2024 |24STCV06387

Case Number: 24STCV06387 Hearing Date: August 13, 2024 Dept: 34 The Motion to Stay Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. BACKGROUND: On March 14, 2024, Plaintiff Nanette Kinkade (Plaintiff) filed her Complaint against Defendant Art Brand Studios, LLC (Defendant) for provisional remedies in aid of arbitration, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.8. On March 15, 2024, Plaintiff filed her Motion for Preliminary Injunction. On April 22, 2024, Defendant filed its Answer to the Complaint. On April 25, 2024, the court granted Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction. On May 9, 2024, the court entered its Order Granting Preliminary Injunction. On May 9, 2024, Defendant filed its Notice of Appeal. On May 9, 2024, Defendant filed its Motion to Stay Preliminary Injunction (Motion to Stay). Defendant concurrently filed its Proposed Order. On May 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed her Opposition to the Motion to Stay. On May 29, 2024, Defendant filed its Reply in support of the Motion to Stay. Defendant concurrently filed Declaration of Myriah V. Jaworski. On May 30, 2024, Defendant filed Amended Exhibits to Reply. ANALYSIS: Legal Standard Except as provided in Sections 917.1 to 917.9, inclusive, and in Section 116.810, the perfecting of an appeal stays proceedings in the trial court upon the judgment or order appealed from or upon the matters embraced therein or affected thereby, including enforcement of the judgment or order, but the trial court may proceed upon any other matter embraced in the action and not affected by the judgment or order. (Code Civ. Proc., § 916, subd. (a).) In California, a long-established set of rules governs stays of injunctive ordersthat is, orders to do something or to refrain from doing something. What rule applies depends on which kind of order it is. An injunction that requires no action and merely preserves the status quo (a so-called prohibitory injunction) ordinarily takes effect immediately, while an injunction requiring the defendant to take affirmative action (a so-called mandatory injunction) is automatically stayed during the pendency of the appeal. (Daly v. San Bernardino Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors (2021) 11 Cal.5th 1030, 1035.) The provisions of this chapter shall not limit the power of a reviewing court or of a judge thereof to stay proceedings during the pendency of an appeal or to issue a writ of supersedeas or to suspend or modify an injunction during the pendency of an appeal or to make any order appropriate to preserve the status quo, the effectiveness of the judgment subsequently to be entered, or otherwise in aid of its jurisdiction. (Code Civ. Proc., § 923.) Discussion The Parties Arguments Defendant moves the Court to either: (a) confirm the Order Granting Preliminary Injunction is stayed pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 916, subdivision (a); or, in the alternative, (b) exercise its discretion to stay the Order Granting Preliminary Injunction. (Motion to Stay, p. 5:1821.) Defendant argues: (1) that the preliminary injunction is mandatory and is therefore automatically stayed pending appellate review; and (2) that, alternatively, the Court should grant a discretionary stay because Defendant should not succeed on appeal only to have a pyrrhic victory. (Motion to Stay, pp. 2:1011, 4:1920.) Plaintiff disagrees, arguing: (1) that Defendant has waived its challenge to the preliminary injunction; (2) that this is not a mandatory injunction; and (3) that a discretionary stay is not appropriate because Defendant does not raise any difficult question of law, Plaintiff established a likelihood of success on the merits, and Plaintiff will suffer irreparable harm without the injunction. (Opposition, pp. 8:6, 8:26, 11:2324, 12:12, 13:21.) In its Reply, Defendant reiterates its arguments, and it argues that it did not waive its challenge to the preliminary injunction. (Reply, p. 7:12.) Invited Error Plaintiff points to a proposed order by Defendant that purportedly waived Defendants right to challenge the preliminary injunction. (Opposition, p. 8:710 and Exh. D.) Plaintiff argues that this conduct by Defendant was invited error, which should prevent Defendant from claiming it as a ground for reversal on appeal. (Id. at p. 8:1116, citations omitted.) The court disagrees with this argument. On April 25, 2024, the court granted Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Minute Order dated April 25, 2024, p. 13.) The court ordered Plaintiff to prepare the order for the Court. (Ibid.) The court also wrote: If the parties can not [sic] agree on the language to be used for the proposed Order, then all parties are ordered to submit a Joint Status Report by 05/02/2024. (Ibid.) The court has not been presented with any evidence that suggests Defendant supported a preliminary injunction prior to the court issuing a preliminary injunction. Rather, Defendant only submitted a proposed order on the preliminary injunction after the court already granted the preliminary injunction and urged the Parties to confer on language for a proposed order. Overall, this evidence does not support an argument that Defendant invited error or waived its challenge. The Preliminary Injunction is Mandatory and Automatically Stayed Upon and During Appeal The Order Granting Preliminary Injunction is a mandatory injunction that is automatically stayed upon the perfecting (and during the pendency) of an appeal. (Code Civ. Proc., § 916, subd. (a); Daly, supra, 11 Cal.5th at p. 1035.) This preliminary injunction is a mandatory injunction because it requires action that changes the status quo. Specifically, the Order Granting Preliminary Injunction: (1) immediately restrains and enjoins Defendant from exercising rights and performing activities that it was exercising and performing immediately before the injunction was entered; and (2) requires (within seven business days of the entry of the Order) Defendant to provide Plaintiff with certain information that Plaintiff did not have before the injunction was entered. (Order Granting Preliminary Injunction, pp. 2:13:25, 3:274:23.) The court confirms that the Order Granting Preliminary Injunction is STAYED. A Discretionary Stay Would be Appropriate if the Preliminary Injunction were Prohibitory Even if the Order Granting Preliminary Injunction were prohibitory in nature, a discretionary stay would still be appropriate here. Plaintiffs prayer is for an injunction, costs, and attorneys fees. (Complaint, pp. 8:229:3.) Given that the Order Granting Preliminary Injunctionand thus, the entire merits of the case up to this pointis currently in front of the Court of Appeal, it is wholly appropriate for the court to stay the preliminary injunction and allow the Court of Appeal to proceed unimpeded with its review of this matter. In addition, the court recognizes its prior determination that the balance of the harms tips in favor of issuing a preliminary injunction. (Minute Order dated April 25, 2024, p. 13.) However, the court has also been persuaded that it would be prudent to allow the Court of Appeal to finish its review before the status quo is changed. Otherwise, as Defendant argues, Defendant might be irreparably harmed (for example, by having to terminate its employees, and by having to terminate its ongoing commercial relationships related to the intellectual property at issue) during appellate review, which would be meaningless even if Defendant won above. (Id. at p. 12.) Conclusion The Motion to Stay Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED.

Document

Stepp, Michael v. Johnson, Cornell

Jun 21, 2023 |Mark T Bailey |Personal Injury |2023CV031804

Document

Gonzales, Alexander et al v. Autozone Inc et al

Jul 23, 2021 |Jill Deborah Dorancy |Wrongful Death |2021CV032313

Document

Pino, Susan v. Krug, Carleen

Aug 16, 2024 |Kandace Gerdes |Personal Injury Motor Vehicle |2024CV032501

Document

Thiel, Joshua v. Community Mgmt Specialists et al

Aug 13, 2024 |J Eric Elliff |Personal Injury |2024CV032458

Document

Martin, Laforest v. Matteson, David et al

Aug 14, 2024 |Jill Deborah Dorancy |Personal Injury Motor Vehicle |2024CV032481

Document

Lifshen, Daniel v. Wareashby, Penny

Aug 16, 2024 |Mark T Bailey |Personal Injury Motor Vehicle |2024CV032508

Document

Gonzales, Alexander et al v. Autozone Inc et al

Jul 23, 2021 |Jill Deborah Dorancy |Wrongful Death |2021CV032313

Document

Williams, Ashley et al v. Gutierrez, Brandon et al

Aug 15, 2024 |J Eric Elliff |Personal Injury Motor Vehicle |2024CV032498

Exhibit - Attach to Pleading/Doc - Exhibit F part 1 to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration March 19, 2018 (2024)

FAQs

How to include exhibits in motion? ›

say what the document is, how you got it and when. You may want to use this format: “Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of an email I received from Plaintiff on June 5, 2017.” Mark each exhibit with a letter or number. Many judges require parties to also tab the exhibit with the letter on the side.

What are exhibits in documents? ›

Documents, photographs, or other items you bring to trial to help prove your case are called exhibits. The judge must to allow you to admit the exhibit as evidence in order for you to use it in your case. The court has specific rules and procedures you must follow during your trial to do this.

How many days to file a motion for reconsideration in federal court? ›

The deadline to file a Motion for Reconsideration will be a certain period of time after the judge has issued the order that you would like to have reconsidered or after you are served with the order, often between 14 and 30 days.

Can you attach exhibits to a motion to dismiss Florida? ›

Generally, there are exceptions to this rule, such as including as an exhibit a document that the plaintiff relied on in its complaint. The decision whether to include an exhibit in a motion to dismiss is a strategic choice that depends on individual circ*mstances.

What is the difference between exhibit and attachment? ›

Exhibit would usually be a standalone document that's being attached for approval (if resolutions), or explaining something (if a memo). Attachment is usually only used for correspondence (like at the bottom of a letter, you'd say “attachments” and list what's attached).

What is the meaning of exhibit 1? ›

Exhibit 1 means the Exhibit so marked, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement. Such Exhibit is hereby incorporated by reference herein and made a part hereof, and may be referred to in this Agreement and any other related instrument or document without being attached hereto.

What are the three types of exhibits? ›

Trade shows—also known as expos—fall into three major groups: consumer trade shows, industry trade shows, and trade shows that appeal to both industries and consumers.

Is an exhibit the same as evidence? ›

Documents, pictures, and other physical evidence are called “exhibits.” Like witness testimony, exhibits must be presented during the trial and the rules of evidence apply to any exhibit that a party “offers” as evidence.

What are the four common types of exhibits? ›

When attending a trade show event, there are many decisions that need to be made. One of the first things to determine is which Impressive Exhibit Types you will be setting up at the trade show. There are four main trade show exhibit types: linear exhibits, island exhibits, peninsula exhibits and end-cap exhibits.

What happens after a motion for reconsideration? ›

Wait for the Court's Decision:

After considering your Motion for Reconsideration and any responses from the other parties, the court will issue a decision either granting or denying the motion. This decision will be based on the court's assessment of the legal and factual issues raised.

What is the timeline for motion for reconsideration? ›

You must file a motion for reconsideration within 10 days of being served with the written notice of entry of the order you want the court to reconsider. The motion must also include an affidavit with information about the original order and the new facts, circ*mstances, or law. The requirements are very specific.

What are two things all motions must state? ›

Every motion to the Court shall clearly state its purpose and the facts on which it is based and may present legal argument in support thereof. No separate brief may be filed. A motion should be concise and shall comply with any applicable page limits.

Can you introduce evidence on a motion to dismiss? ›

Compiling necessary research and (maybe) evidence

First, you must conduct all the necessary research that will provide a legal basis for your motion to dismiss, whether that includes case law, statutory law, or other legal bases.

Do you attach exhibits to an answer? ›

Each page of your answer must be numbered in order, including any exhibits you may choose to attach. The answer form is two pages, so if you are adding any attachments you will start the page numbering of the attachment with page 3.

How do you beat a motion to dismiss in Florida? ›

Under Florida law, this response can take two forms: the traverse and the demurrer. A traverse is a type of pleading filed to contradict and defeat a motion to dismiss by either specifically denying a material fact or by presenting additional facts that amount to a prima facie case of guilt.

How to reference exhibits in a legal document? ›

Include a typed notation within the body of the legal document where the exhibit should be referenced. Thereafter, assign the exhibit with an identifying number or letter. For instance, this notation can state either "See Exhibit A" or "See Exhibit 1".

How to introduce an exhibit at deposition? ›

- The exhibit is provided to the court reporter from counsel. - The court reporter marks the exhibit. - The court reporter announces the number of the exhibit (“Exhibit 1 is marked for identification” or “This is being marked as Exhibit 1”). - The use of exhibit labels is recommended over ink exhibit stamps.

How do you list exhibits in a letter? ›

Typically, exhibits are sequentially numbered (Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2, etc.) or lettered (Exhibit A, Exhibit B, etc.). Exhibit list: Prepare an exhibit list that includes a description of each exhibit and its corresponding exhibit number or letter.

How do you introduce new evidence during a trial? ›

How do I introduce an exhibit in court? To show the court one of your exhibits: 1) First, show the exhibit to the other party (or the other party's attorney), 2) Next, either you or your witness must testify about the exhibit to show that the evidence is relevant to your case and is authentic (not made up).

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Aron Pacocha

Last Updated:

Views: 5744

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (68 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Aron Pacocha

Birthday: 1999-08-12

Address: 3808 Moen Corner, Gorczanyport, FL 67364-2074

Phone: +393457723392

Job: Retail Consultant

Hobby: Jewelry making, Cooking, Gaming, Reading, Juggling, Cabaret, Origami

Introduction: My name is Aron Pacocha, I am a happy, tasty, innocent, proud, talented, courageous, magnificent person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.